Home
Tables/Results etc
Forum
Links
Contact Us
FAQ
Sponsors
Gallery
Your own website?
Site Stats

thebigfella Your discussion on the Raddy matter, these are always the biggest problems with disputes you ever have when a committee member validates a wrong. There is no dispute to answer to really....if the committee gave a blessing to a wrong then they are culpable...no-one else. I think all sides should be directing it in that direction, not each other.


Stevey G you enjoyed yourself mate and that was what it was all about.....and we enjoyed the show


thebigfella The greatest bet i have ever seen in all my life gambling was the 4/6 Mayweather. He should have been 1/6!


thebigfella I'm going for Malinaggi Lee. He could even stop him late on, maybe cuts. Malinaggi has no power due to a history of bad hands and as you know Lee i have always said i thought Hatton was slightly over rated. Gambling wise it would have to be Malinaggi 3/1 on points PLUS small savers on him winning in 10,11,12 all at 50/1.


thebigfella Dean you were better than the act...lol.


Gramps deano..thought it was just the artist in you coming out..lol...piss artist..ha ha...college course certainly not wasted..lol


DEANO #11 this id the first time i have shown my face on here since well before the presentation, i will never embarras myself like that again !!!!


Gramps col...how do u see the hatton fight going..??..got a feeling it might be 1 fight to many..


Gramps final say..if signing on procedure was wrong..why did commitee i.e graham southwood say that the same 2 players could play last night?.they either signed on or they not..will last night now become a 7-0 defeat as well..?


Gramps ok...in that case then why did committe man take forms and fee and say ok to play..makes website and bury times reports look stupid..spongebob u want to contribute ?